TEI Board Minutes: Conference Call 2014-11-24

xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"??Published on TEI-C website, December 2014

Born-digital.

            <div>
                In attendance:
                <ul class="bulleted"><li>Arianna Ciula (AC)</li><li>Elena Pierazzo (EP)</li><li>John Unsworth (JU)</li><li>James Cummings (JC)</li><li>John Walsh (JW)</li><li>Glen Worthey (GW)</li><li>Martin Mueller (MM, incoming Board member)</li><li>Michelle Dalmau (MD, incoming Board member)</li><li>Pip Willcox (PW, incoming Board member)</li></ul><p>Apologies: Lou Burnard, Marjorie Burghart (incoming Board member)</p>

            </div>
            <div>
                Agenda
                <ul class="ordered"><li>Minutes of Business and Board meeting </li><li>Discussion of final details about offering free memberships</li><li>Choice of the chair of the Programme Committee fore TEI 2015</li><li>Conference code of conduct</li><li>Web site scoping and costing (Lou)</li><li>Election of Board members; beginning of terms (Elena &amp;
                        Martin)</li><li>- Financial support for the TEI MOOC (Marjorie)</li><li>- Calendar for next meetings (James &amp; Elena) </li></ul></div>
            <div>
                Minutes of Business and Board meetings 
                <p>GW agrees to take minutes for current meeting, and to work with Kevin Hawkins
                    to edit and post them quickly.</p>

                <p>Discussion of previous minutes: <ul class="bulleted"><li><a href="/Membership/Meetings/2014/mm73.xml">
                                2014 (Evanston) Business meeting</a></li><li><a href="/Board/bm54.xml"> 2014 Board
                                meeting (Evanston)</a></li></ul>   No comments or corrections to these minutes suggested.</p>
                <p>Thanks to Kevin, Glen &amp; James for getting those minutes onto the website
                    relatively quickly.  </p>


            </div>
            <div>
                Discussion of final details about offering free memberships to workshop
                    attendees
                <p>Regarding our policy of offering a free TEI-C membership to attendees at
                    TEI-listed workshops, we discussed our decision taken in Evanston not to
                    offer free membership to TEI conference attendees.  The specific purpose of
                    this benefit is to bring people into the community, and we assume that TEI
                    conference attendees are already part of that community.</p>


                <p>Elena has posted this decision/discussion to the members' list, and MD notes
                    that some discussion of substance followed, including questions about
                    whether non-curricular "local training" would qualify for the benefit, and
                    clarifications about the one-year-only policy.</p>


                <p>All agreed that people should be invited and encouraged to join the TEI in
                    order to qualify for the lower conference registration rate.</p>


                <p>We formulated a requirement that any qualifying event must take place before
                    (and not as part of) the conference.</p>


                <p>Free membership is not offered to people who take TEI instruction as part of
                    a regular curriculum - but rather only to those in a specialized training
                    situation.</p>


                <p>JU notes that this benefit only applies once, to new memberships -- that is,
                    only a person's first year of membership is free.  JU also clarified that it
                    applies only to individual memberships, not institutional.  JU will write
                    these policies for posting to the members website.</p>


            </div>
            <div>
                Choice of the chair of the Programme Committee for TEI 2015
                <p>In Evanston, we decided to wait for new Board members to be installed before
                    choosing the PC chair for TEI 2015. </p>


                <p>Possible candidates among the new Board members are: Elena, Pip,
                    and Michelle. Martin is exempted because of recent service as PC chair;
                    Marjorie is exempted because she is the Local Organizer. </p>


                <p>Discussion of responsibilities of PC chair: s/he is charged to <ul class="bulleted"><li>works w/local org cmte</li><li>organizes reviewing (via ConfTool), </li><li>chooses keynotes</li><li>acts as liaison with Board</li></ul> JU notes that a few elements of ConfTool should be handled by the
                    Local Organizer</p>


                <p>Keynotes should be agreed by both PC chair and Local Organizer (who bears
                    budget responsibility for the conference), so that is a matter on which they
                    should coordinate</p>


                <p>Pip and Michelle both graciously volunteer as willing Chairs. After some
                    discussion, the desirability of having the Local Organizer and the PC chair
                    in similar time zones prevails, and Pip agrees to accept the role.</p>


            </div>
            <div>
                Conference code of conduct
                <p>GW presents the rationale for drafting a TEI-C conference code of conduct,
                    and for establishing the practice of posting it on the conference websites.
                    Shares some experience with a similar practice in ADHO.</p>


                <p>EP notes that a growing number of employers are asking their people not to
                    attend conferences without such a code.  GW provides one such example in his
                    own employer, Stanford Libraries
                    (see http://library.stanford.edu/news/2013/07/sul-supports-conference-anti-harassment-policies).</p>


                <p>PW offers strong support for this practice, with which JC concurs (citing
                    their successful adoption of the ADHO code for the Oxford Summer Schools).
                     </p>


                <p>The other Board members present agree that we should proceed with drafting
                    such a code soon, and presenting a text for Board approval.</p>


                <p>AC notes that her experience in discussion of the ADHO code with her EADH
                    colleagues should help us to present a flexible, culturally appropriate, and
                    sensitive document, and volunteers to work with GW to draft a tweakable
                    version before end of the current Board term (when both AC and GW rotate off
                    the Board).</p>


                <p>After brief discussion, this approach is approved.</p>


            </div>
            <div>
                Web site scoping and costing (Lou, in absentia)
                <p>Elena will act as liaison between the new Board and Lou on the scoping and
                    costing of a website redesign (since Lou is rotating off the Board)</p>


                <p>JU will necessarily be involved in this work, both because of his role as
                    Treasurer, and because he supervises the work of TEI/ADHO sys admin Ian
                    Rifkin.</p>


                <p>All agree that Lou, Kevin Hawkins, JU, and EP will constitute the primary
                    website group.</p>

            </div>
            <div>
                Election of Board members, beginning of terms
                <p>Question whether to start new Board terms at the annual conference</p>


                <p>Some objections noted from a practical point of view, e.g., Do the elections
                    need to be held more in advance of the conference?  Should we keep the
                    existing brief overlap of outgoing and incoming Board members?</p>


                <p>MM notes that ADHO officers change over at the meeting; would like not to
                    vote at this time, but rather defer to new Board, and have some discussion
                    over email. Would favor earlier elections in order to facilitate a
                    transition at the conference. GW notes that ADHO changeover in officers is
                    not quite as simple as presented.</p>


                <p>MD generally favors keeping the overlap.</p>


                <p>EP notes that one reason in reducing size of Board is to reduce travel
                    expenditures (so that it would not be feasible to pay for all candidates to
                    travel to the conference "just in case" they win and need to attend the
                    in-person Board meeting.</p>


                <p>AC notes that newly elected members can be notified prior to the members
                    meeting so that they are encouraged to attend; however their expenses should
                    not be eligible for coverage until their terms starts i.e. after the members
                    meeting.</p>


                <p>JW favors earlier elections, and more communications with incoming Board --
                    somewhat less informal.  Process should be formalized more, encourage
                    elected members. Argues that formal turnover should occur AFTER the
                    conference, since existing members have ongoing responsibilities during and
                    just after conf.  But agrees with MM that new members should be welcomed and
                    encouraged to participate, but not subsidized.  Worth discussing more, and
                    not deciding right away.</p>


                <p>JC in favor of overlap, but would be good for new members to attend in-person
                    board meetings, though this requires advance notice - perhaps advance
                    warning.</p>


                <p>EP asks whether this is feasible, given need to plan travel in advance.</p>


                <p>MM favors written discussion, and a written proposal that can be voted
                    upon.</p>


                <p>EP proposes email discussion for now, with a vote in the next conference
                    call.</p>

            </div>
            <div>
                Financial support for the TEI MOOC (Marjorie, presented by EP)
                <p>The "TEI MOOC" idea was presented by EP and MB in our Evanston meeting.</p>
                <p>EP and MB have decided to do in English, not in French, fearing that not
                    enough people will enroll if in French.  They will apply for 15K Euros to
                    produce this MOOC; would be helpful symbolically to have official TEI
                    financial support, even if only verbal, or minimal.  MB is the leader of
                    this effort, with EP assisting.</p>


                <p>MM requests more detail in writing, not having been present in the earlier
                    discussion; EP refers to discussion in the minutes of Evanston Board
                    mtg.</p>


                <p>Funding deadline is 5-6 days from now, so need for a quick decision.  AC
                    notes that endorsement was already decided in Evanston.  GW supports a quick
                    email discussion and vote.</p>


                <p>JC would like to see the TEI be visible in MOOC space, in spite of possible
                    qualms about effectiveness of MOOCs in general, a sentiment shared by many
                    on the Board.</p>


                <p>MD asks whether MB and EP have an assessment plan in mind to determine the
                    resulting MOOC's effectiveness.</p>


                <p>Resolved that EP or MB will submit a proposal by email very soon, and ask for
                    a rapid vote (by current Board - although discussion by new Board members
                    welcomed).</p>

            </div>
            <div>
                Calendar for next year's meetings, and "getting things done" (James &amp;
                    Elena)

                <p>EP notes that posting a public calendar of Board meetings might increase
                    accountability and be useful to help us get things done more
                    efficiently.</p>

                <p>Default time slot: 4 p.m. GMT <ul class="bulleted"><li>13 January</li><li>24 February</li><li>7 April</li><li>21 May</li><li>25 June</li></ul> (EP will also circulate dates by email)</p>


                <p>Also in this same vein: the Board should adopt a lightweight task-management
                    system. JC proposes Trello (which he uses frequently) - can be public or
                    private; editable by whoever is delegated.  Notes that Trello is not used
                    for Council work at the moment (since its tickets are tracked on
                    SourceForge), but he may propose it to Council as well.</p>


                <p>Value and specifics of Trello discussed, and its adoption agreed upon.
                     Action on JC to set up a simple Trello board and lead the Board into using
                    it.</p>


            </div>
            <div>
                Varia
                <p>Election of new Chair of Council is ongoing during December; JC will not be
                    running, but is on Council for another year, so will remain available in the
                    spirit of overlap.</p>


                <p> EP and others thanked those who are rotating at the end of 2014 off the
                    Board (Arianna, Glen, John, and Lou -- who is joining Council), and the
                    Council (Sebastian Rahtz, Elli Mylonas). </p>
            </div>
        </div>
    
</tei></p>