TEI SIG on Correspondence - Minutes College Station, Nov 9, 2012
Attendees: Syd Baumann, Gary Chafee, Julia Flanders, Albertina Hughey, Mary MacNeil, Daniel Röwenstrunk, David Sewell, Peter Stadler, Jennifer Stertzer, Werner Wegstein
Report on last year's activities
- Two people added their encoding practices to SIG:Correspondence/EncodingComparisons for a comparison between several customized or non-customized TEI versions for correspondence (= last year's short term goal)
- Ron posted his DALF P5 (preliminary) proposal
Request for a correspondence module and a wrapper element for correspondence meta data
Details about proposal were given in advance at: SIG:Correspondence/RequestForModule
- There is agreement about a correspondence module with the name “correspondence”
- There is agreement to put the correspondence metadata in the <sourceDesc>; if there is a wrapper, it should probably be called <>, but that detail is less important
- Peter shows the group the DALF and WeGA systems
Decisions
- letter metadata unit <> should be repeatable, member of att.declarable, and member of model.bibl (or whatever <msDesc> is a member of)
- Metadata should be organized (inside the wrapper) as a set of special-purpose elements (e.g., <sent> or <sender> and <received> or <addressee>), with a general-purpose element (e.g., <correspItem>) for those cases we can’t predict (e.g., transmission, censoring, translation -- although we just predicted those :-). These elements would likely all have the same content model. Also need to have model.pLike or model.noteLike (or both) for prose explanations.
Further work during the meeting
- Syd starts writing a rough ODD draft for the above decisions
- We got stuck about a simple list of events (sending, receiving etc.) vs. a more distinguished separation between the creation events and the reception events
- got stuck again by trying to turn the agents into events and back again
- Final decision is to go with an actor based approach as done by DALF and WeGA and add some generic element to be able to take care of additional requirements
- The result of our ODD efforts are uploaded as a “second draft” on SIG:Correspondence/ODD_work
AOB
nothing