<sic>

<sic> (latin for thus or so ) 明らかに間違い,不正確ではあるが,そのまま収録してあるテキスト. 3.4.1 Apparent Errors
モジュールcore — 3 Elements Available in All TEI Documents
属性att.global (@xml:id, @n, @xml:lang, @rend, @rendition, @xml:base, @xml:space) (att.global.linking (@corresp, @synch, @sameAs, @copyOf, @next, @prev, @exclude, @select)) (att.global.analytic (@ana)) (att.global.facs (@facs)) att.responsibility (@cert, @resp)
当該モジュールを使用するもの
上位
下位
宣言

<rng:element name="sic">
 <rng:ref name="att.global.attributes"/>
 <rng:ref name="att.global.linking.attributes"/>
 <rng:ref name="att.global.analytic.attributes"/>
 <rng:ref name="att.global.facs.attributes"/>
 <rng:ref name="att.responsibility.attributes"/>
 <rng:ref name="macro.paraContent"/>
</rng:element>
element sic
{
   att.global.attributes,
   att.global.linking.attributes,
   att.global.analytic.attributes,
   att.global.facs.attributes,
   att.responsibility.attributes,
   macro.paraContent
}
for his nose was as sharp as
a pen, and <sic>a Table</sic> of green fields.

If all that is desired is to call attention to the apparent problem in the copy text, sic may be used alone:

I don't know, Juan. It's so far in the past now
— how <sic>we can</sic> prove or disprove anyone's theories?

It is also possible, using the choice and corr elements, to provide a corrected reading:

I don't know, Juan. It's so far in the past now
— how <choice>
 <sic>we can</sic>
 <corr>can we</corr>
</choice> prove or disprove anyone's theories?
for his nose was as sharp as
a pen, and <choice>
 <sic>a Table</sic>
 <corr>a' babbld</corr>
</choice> of green fields.